D Multivocality in Global History
Gendering Premodern Asian Relations: A Discussion with Global History
Event Details
-
Date
II. Thursday, 11th September, 08:30-10:30
-
LocationM1052
-
ThemeD Multivocality in Global History
Convenor
- Lisa Hellman (Lund University)
Chair
- Lisa Hellman (Lund University)
Panelists
- Lisa Phongsavath (University of Bonn)
- Lisa Hellman (Lund University)
- Monica Gines Blasi (Swedish Collegium for Advanced Study)
- Jing Hu (Berlin State Library)
Papers
-
Lisa Phongsavath
Gendered Education and Child Mobility in Early-Modern Siam -
Lisa Hellman
Moved Apart: Communicated Experiences of Separation in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries -
Monica Gines Blasi
Gendering Chinese Indentured Migration and Human Trafficking to Latin America and Southeast Asia (1830s-1930s) -
Jing Hu
Echoes of War: The Afterlife of Two Korean Women in the East Asian War (1592–1598)
Abstract
A recurring criticism against global history is its weakness as regards gender, as well as the analysis of power relations. In addition, there are still debates about to what degree the field has managed to provincialise Europe.This panel aims to address the three themes, all of them critical for propelling global history forward. We do so by proposing four papers grounded in various processes of gendering, of men and women, in South and Southeast Asia (Namely Japan, Korea, China and the Greater Siam), rather than in European contacts with these regions.Crucial to our discussion of processes of gendering is what that implies for power relations, and what it thereby can contribute to larger debates such as those on colonialism, state building and household structures. Therefore, the papers share a focus on actors on various levels of precarity, whether through age (such as children), practices (such as sex work) archival silence (in terms of emotions) or forced mobility (such as trafficking). That allows fora natural cross-fertilization of current debates on intersectional gender analyses and on forced mobility –and we hope that it might show ways to integrate both power analyses and examples from Asian history in the nuancing of future global history.The time frame is primarily early modern, but we consciously include a 19th century example not to presume that practices of precarity and coercion differed dramatically before and after that shift.Thus, we hope to expand the type of archives placed front andcentre, as well as the type of questions we pose to them. The aim is thus to provide both a regionally and temporally fresh approach to the task of gendering global history.